Enzo Torrone

I support responsible development that strengthens our community, but I oppose overdevelopment, especially in established single-family home neighborhoods. Growth should be balanced with the character, infrastructure, traffic, and quality of life of existing residents.

I believe parks are meant to be shared community spaces, not places to live. If suitable indoor housing is available that meets a person’s needs, I believe they should be supported in moving indoors, where they can have a safer and more sanitary environment.

I am not in favour of road-pricing measures. I believe we should focus on a practical, sustainable traffic-management plan that addresses congestion and environmental needs without placing additional taxes or costs on residents.

I believe additional revenue may be necessary if budgets are responsibly managed and funding is still insufficient. Before asking residents to pay more, however, I feel we should first look carefully for waste and ensure existing tax dollars are used wisely.

I believe transparency is important, and residents should be able to clearly see how their tax dollars are being spent. Providing project budgets, timelines, and regular updates would help build trust and accountability.

I support all three areas, but I lean toward enforcement, particularly addressing weapon offences. I also believe prevention, treatment and better-maintained public spaces can play an important role in improving safety.

I would support an increase above inflation only to ensure TPS is properly staffed. Once staffing needs are met, funding could track inflation, while using civilian services for appropriate entry-level responsibilities may help reduce overall costs.

I would support strict rules to make sure information is only used for its intended purpose. Clear limits on access, retention and sharing would help protect privacy while still allowing the technology to support public safety.

I lean toward expansion, especially where new rapid-transit lines can connect underserved areas and support future growth. At the same time, I think funding should still maintain existing infrastructure and improve service reliability so the system we have continues to work well

I think a balanced approach is important. Streets should support transit, walking and cycling, but also deliveries, trades, accessibility, essential vehicle access and reasonable parking. Good planning should try to accommodate these needs wherever possible.

I believe reducing approval times and development charges should be the priority. Lowering the cost and time required to build housing can increase supply and reduce costs passed on to buyers and renters, improving overall affordability.

I think Toronto should continue providing affordable housing while working with experienced developers and operators. Given the challenges TCHC has faced, these partnerships could improve building quality, maintenance, safety and accountability.

I support focusing new housing along major corridors and near transit. I think this would allow Toronto to grow while respecting established neighbourhoods, and could also help reduce traffic, car dependence and environmental impacts.

I support lowering municipal charges to help reduce the cost of building housing. I believe this could encourage more construction and make housing more affordable for buyers and renters.

I support stronger professional project management, procurement and contracting. I also think limiting scope changes and fully funding projects upfront are important, with changes only when needed to address a genuine viability issue.

I support using competitive contracts where they provide better value, along with specialized agencies with clear performance expectations. I think both approaches can improve efficiency while maintaining accountability and quality.

I support keeping property-tax increases roughly in line with inflation and population, but only if we can first get spending under control and make sure tax dollars are being used responsibly.

I would choose property taxes as the least disruptive option, but I don’t believe new taxes should be introduced. Property-tax revenue should support responsible spending, with the focus on controlling costs rather than continually raising revenue.

I support reducing the city’s asset base where properties are no longer needed. Selling or consolidating surplus properties could reduce costs for taxpayers while putting valuable assets to better use

I support stronger advocacy with the province. Toronto should have greater authority to make decisions on local issues, while continuing to work with the province where cooperation is needed.

I believe decisions should not rest on one person’s views. We should listen to different perspectives and work toward practical solutions that reflect the needs and priorities of the majority.

I support all three priorities, but I would put safety first. I believe a safe and well-managed community provides the foundation for growth, strong core services and a good quality of life.

I believe all four areas should be considered when measuring performance. Clear, measurable results should reflect housing, finances, services, safety and the specific needs of the ward.

I believe safety should always come first when reviewing road lanes. Changes should be based on clear evidence, while also considering how they affect congestion, traffic flow and the needs of all road users.

I believe everyone should have the right to demonstrate peacefully and safely. At the same time, transportation and access to essential services should remain open, with a respectful balance between protest rights and the needs of others.

I selected resident services because technology should make life easier for residents. I also believe investments should be used wherever they make sense to improve efficiency, accountability and the quality of public services.

I support reducing or redesigning lower-priority services first. I also believe Toronto should maintain an emergency reserve and bank appropriate year-end surpluses to help manage unexpected costs without immediately raising taxes.

I support lowering commercial taxes and fees. I believe this could help small local businesses stay open, support local employment and strengthen Toronto’s economy.

I lean toward targeted tax reductions or incentives for major employers and investments that can provide clear economic benefits to Toronto, including jobs, investment and long-term growth.

I support keeping a steady pipeline of projects while expanding apprenticeships and training. I believe combining predictable work with a skilled workforce can increase construction capacity and support good local jobs.

I support prioritizing basic maintenance and keeping existing infrastructure in good repair. I believe maintaining what we already have is more responsible and cost-effective than continually adding new infrastructure.

I support reducing barriers for arts, culture and nightlife. Making it easier and more affordable to operate can help local businesses, artists and cultural organizations thrive while contributing to vibrant and active communities.

I support mandatory data disclosure so Toronto can understand how autonomous taxis affect safety, congestion, curb use and transportation planning. Good data will help the city make informed decisions and adjust policies when needed.